Editorial
Sometimes a kernel of truth can conceal a larger deception. Or an ill informed statement is close enough to what we want the truth to be that we believe it too easily. Even discussions with well meaning people can reinforce self-defeating positions. The longer misinformation goes unchallenged, the more entrenched and harder to correct it becomes. In an environment short on civil discourse, such poorly supported perspectives are easily embraced and can become “common knowledge” that is simply wrong. Sometimes simple math can contradict simple sound bites; no matter how appealing they may “sound“. In addition, we are confused when valid and compelling long-term concerns become mistakenly intertwined with short-term critical choices.
Much of today’s conversation on Josephine County funding issues shares these characteristics. Catch phrases or political slogans serve as entire political philosophies with little effort to examine or challenge the underlying facts or circumstances.
Prosperity with no public safety is not possible. Each of us needs to determine the necessity and worth of public safety in light of facts and truth. Let’s take a few moments to explore some of the more important and prominent misconceptions facing us today.
The County has a $100 million annual budget. Cut spending before asking for more taxes
Sounds reasonable. The County budget has historically been stated in terms of over $100 million. Unfortunately this understanding is seriously flawed in several ways. First, laws require the County to use accounting methods that inflate revenues by double counting, as both income and expense, internal transfers between departments. For every dollar of services that one department pays another, the County Budget is reported as being higher. On the basis of real money, received from outside sources, the budget for 2008-2009 is actually only $49 million.
Also problematic are legal constraints on how that $49 million can be spent. Because of funding source, approximately 83% is required to be spent on specific things. For example gas tax revenues must be spent on roads. Grants too are approved for specific uses. If those specifics are not met the money stops coming and if the task is done for less money the balance must be returned. Of the remaining 17% ($8.3 million), most of it ($5 million) comes from reserves set aside in prior years. What are left are basically the property taxes paid annually to the County of $3.2 million to pay for all County services and operations. That is the real world and those the real numbers by which we need to view our options.
If we operated just 10 to 12% more efficiently, we could replace our $12 million O&C funding loss and the problem is solved.
Clean up your own house first. Sounds reasonable. Except considerable effort and progress has already been made to do exactly that. As recently as 2005-2006 the County Operating Funds Budget was at $75 million. It is now reduced by some 35% to this years meager $49 million. Indeed we have cut our county staff to the proverbial bone and no management process or accounting method on earth can replace a $12 million loss from $8.3 discretionary budget.
No timber, no taxes.
This slogan alone does more to shut down a meaningful discussion about funding than almost all others. It carries the emotional punch of the Feds reneging on the contract with the County and espouses a financial model that worked well not very long ago. The vast majority of us would really love to see timber fund the County again. This is a decision we may manage to influence and yet it is out of our direct or short-term control. The bulk of the forestland belongs to the Feds. The lumber mills have closed. At best, it will take years to revive this industry locally. This is a classic case of confusing long term issues with short term realities. We need to find a way to survive the short term so we can succeed in the long term. The negative impact of lost O&C funding looms much closer than any chance we have to revive timber revenues.
They are going to triple or quadruple my property taxes.
This is just flat out wrong. At the proposed rates of $.99 for district one and $1.09 for district 2 (per thousand of assessed valuation) most County residents would pay little more than $30 per month for both districts, and Grants Pass residents would pay about half that much for district 1. None of this would affect taxes paid to the City, schools or bonds.
We are already paying for Sheriff Services we don’t get.
None of us want to pay for something we don’t get, or pay for something twice. The right question is; how much have we really been paying for Sheriff’s services? Answer: nothing. In fact, for as long as most of us remember timber receipts and O&C revenues have covered the entire Sheriff’s budget and then some. Total County revenue from property taxes is $3.2 million for all County services. Spread over 80,000 County residents that is about $40 apiece. Most of this year’s funding for the Sheriff is coming out of reserves set aside in prior years that are now depleted.
If nothing changes to replace these revenues, the current course will leave about $330,000 for the Sheriff’s Office in 2009-2010, roughly 3% of last year’s budget. While most new taxes are proposed to expand government programs and/or keeps up with inflation, that is not what we are being asked to consider. Rather than government growth, the sheriff’s taxing districts are required to replace critical services that we will lose if we fail to pay for our own safety.
We pay a lot in taxes. Why can’t they just move it around to where they need it.
Our annual property tax bills include revenues collected by the County on behalf of other legal entities, such as the city you may live in, the school districts, and any bonds approved by the voters. By law, these revenues go 100% to the entities for which they were collected. The fact that they are included on one common tax bill in no way makes these funds available to the County. In fact, if you take a few minutes to examine your tax bill in detail, you will find the amount paid to the County itself is a very small percentage of your total tax bill.
Just combine the Grants Pass Police and County Sheriff into one police force.
This certainly sounds appealing and straightforward. Of course it ignores the practicalities of how that combined force would be funded. No one should pay for services they don’t get. The Grants Pass Police do not have their own funding. They are financed by Grants Pass city property taxes. Residents of Grants Pass are not likely to be willingly to fund countywide police services. Nor are county residents likely to willingly pay full Grants Pass tax rates. For both, that’s only fair.
Why doesn’t somebody do something?
I agree. Apathy could destroy our quality of life. In addition to rights, citizenship comes with responsibilities. Somebody should do something. Anybody would be better than nobody. Worse yet would be for everybody to do nothing. It’s a lot of work to be an educated voter, and yet that is where we must start. Seek out the FACTS that support your positions and reject the misinformation of simple sound bites. Let’s consider the characteristics of the services we need and want and then work together to make them happen for you, your families and each other.
We are creating a new web site for “We the People” to provide an easier way to educate ourselves and facilitate a constructive civic dialogue. It will provide a fast path to “need to know” information and is focused on exploring solutions to issues that have an effect on our prosperity and shared quality of life. Ensuring long term public safety is the best place to start.
www.JOCOTODAY.com is under construction. Please come help us build it.
This message approved and supported by:
The Sheriff’s Advisory Council
- Dick Smith
- Jeff Wolf
- John Richert
- Rich Michelon
- Roy Lindsay
- Curt Bynum
Brian Bayley, Chairman, Josephine County Budget Committee
Jon Jordan, Director, Grants Pass Chamber of Commerce
Ron Dowel, Owner/Operator FastServer LLC, Grants Pass Now, JOCOCIVIC.com
JOCOTODAY.com Advisory Board
- All the above and…
- Shanin Williams
- Mick Terry
- Gary Albright
Citizens for Public Safety Education and Sheriff Long Term Funding Initiative (PAC)